You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence and Clinical Significance of HIV Drug Resistance Mutations by Ultra-Deep Sequencing in Antiretroviral-Naïve Subjects in the CASTLE Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0010952 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Max Lataillade, Jennifer Chiarella, Rong Yang, Steven Schnittman, Victoria Wirtz, Jonathan Uy, Daniel Seekins, Mark Krystal, Marco Mancini, Donnie McGrath, Birgitte Simen, Michael Egholm, Michael Kozal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 81 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 3 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,498
of 196,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,381
of 96,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#361
of 691 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 691 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.