You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Context Maintenance and Retrieval Model of Organizational Processes in Free Recall
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Review, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1037/a0014420 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sean M. Polyn, Kenneth A. Norman, Michael J. Kahana |
| Abstract |
The authors present the context maintenance and retrieval (CMR) model of memory search, a generalized version of the temporal context model of M. W. Howard and M. J. Kahana (2002a), which proposes that memory search is driven by an internally maintained context representation composed of stimulus-related and source-related features. In the CMR model, organizational effects (the tendency for related items to cluster during the recall sequence) arise as a consequence of associations between active context elements and features of the studied material. Semantic clustering is due to longstanding context-to-item associations, whereas temporal clustering and source clustering are both due to associations formed during the study episode. A behavioral investigation of the three forms of organization provides data to constrain the CMR model, revealing interactions between the organizational factors. Finally, the authors discuss the implications of CMR for their understanding of a broad class of episodic memory phenomena and suggest ways in which this theory may guide exploration of the neural correlates of memory search. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 395 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 125 | 30% |
| Researcher | 74 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 8% |
| Professor | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 15% |
| Unknown | 56 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 183 | 43% |
| Neuroscience | 58 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 21 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 9% |
| Unknown | 88 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#344,467
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Review
#60
of 1,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,011
of 183,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Review
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.