↓ Skip to main content

Identifying a Window of Vulnerability during Fetal Development in a Maternal Iron Restriction Model

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying a Window of Vulnerability during Fetal Development in a Maternal Iron Restriction Model
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017483
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camelia Mihaila, Jordan Schramm, Frederick G. Strathmann, Dawn L. Lee, Robert M. Gelein, Anne E. Luebke, Margot Mayer-Pröschel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 5 5%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 18 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,498
of 196,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,520
of 108,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#723
of 1,465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.