↓ Skip to main content

Polymicrobial Nature of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcer Biofilm Infections Determined Using Bacterial Tag Encoded FLX Amplicon Pyrosequencing (bTEFAP)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
6 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
455 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Polymicrobial Nature of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcer Biofilm Infections Determined Using Bacterial Tag Encoded FLX Amplicon Pyrosequencing (bTEFAP)
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scot E. Dowd, Randall D. Wolcott, Yan Sun, Trevor McKeehan, Ethan Smith, Daniel Rhoads

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 402 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 20%
Researcher 53 13%
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Student > Master 45 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 87 21%
Unknown 73 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 75 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 48 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 47 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 3%
Other 55 13%
Unknown 79 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,522,753
of 23,228,787 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#32,097
of 198,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,342
of 90,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#81
of 414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,228,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.