↓ Skip to main content

Task partitioning in insect societies

Overview of attention for article published in Insectes Sociaux, May 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Task partitioning in insect societies
Published in
Insectes Sociaux, May 1999
DOI 10.1007/s000400050119
Authors

F. L. W. Ratnieks, C. Anderson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 4%
Brazil 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 162 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 25%
Researcher 37 20%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 21 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 124 69%
Engineering 9 5%
Environmental Science 7 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 24 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2011.
All research outputs
#7,454,298
of 22,789,076 outputs
Outputs from Insectes Sociaux
#323
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,069
of 35,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insectes Sociaux
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.