↓ Skip to main content

The neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroMolecular Medicine, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses
Published in
NeuroMolecular Medicine, January 2002
DOI 10.1385/nmm:1:2:111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill M. Weimer, Elizabeth Kriscenski-Perry, Yasser Elshatory, David A. Pearce

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 8%
Germany 2 8%
United States 1 4%
Unknown 21 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Professor 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from NeuroMolecular Medicine
#197
of 478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,445
of 130,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroMolecular Medicine
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.