You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Competition Triggers Plasmid-Mediated Enhancement of Substrate Utilisation in Pseudomonas putida
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006065 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiren Joshi, Rachna Dave, Vayalam P. Venugopalan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 62% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,559
of 196,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,719
of 111,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#258
of 515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.