↓ Skip to main content

Typing Clostridium difficile strains based on tandem repeat sequences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Typing Clostridium difficile strains based on tandem repeat sequences
Published in
BMC Microbiology, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-9-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

N Henning Zaiß, Maja Rupnik, Ed J Kuijper, Celine Harmanus, Dolf Michielsen, Koen Janssens, Ulrich Nübel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 13 24%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Computer Science 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#869
of 3,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,291
of 170,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#28
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,214 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.