You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Algebraic Comparison of Partial Lists in Bioinformatics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0036540 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuseppe Jurman, Samantha Riccadonna, Roberto Visintainer, Cesare Furlanello |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 31% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 39% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,552,525
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,559
of 196,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,007
of 165,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,517
of 3,851 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,427 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,851 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.