↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of the RAGE products increases survival in experimental models of severe sepsis and systemic infection

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhibition of the RAGE products increases survival in experimental models of severe sepsis and systemic infection
Published in
Critical Care, November 2007
DOI 10.1186/cc6184
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily C Lutterloh, Steven M Opal, Debra D Pittman, James C Keith, Xiang-Yang Tan, Brian M Clancy, Helen Palmer, Kim Milarski, Ying Sun, John E Palardy, Nicholas A Parejo, Noubar Kessimian

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 72 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 8 10%
Professor 6 8%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,884
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,151
of 90,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.