↓ Skip to main content

Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Identification of Mycobacteria in Routine Clinical Practice

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Identification of Mycobacteria in Routine Clinical Practice
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024720
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amel El Khéchine, Carine Couderc, Christophe Flaudrops, Didier Raoult, Michel Drancourt

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 146 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 10 7%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 9%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 38 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,317,701
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,659
of 196,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,438
of 126,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#456
of 2,515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.