↓ Skip to main content

Bio-Applications of Nanoparticles

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 14: Toxicity Studies of Carbon Nanotubes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Toxicity Studies of Carbon Nanotubes
Chapter number 14
Book title
Bio-Applications of Nanoparticles
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-76713-0_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-387-76712-3, 978-0-387-76713-0
Authors

Jelena Kolosnjaj, Henri Szwarc, Fathi Moussa, Kolosnjaj, Jelena, Szwarc, Henri, Moussa, Fathi

Abstract

As for fullerenes, the potential and the growing use of CNT and their mass production have raised several questions about their safety and environmental impact. Research on the toxicity of carbon nanotubes has just begun and the data are still fragmentary and subject to criticisms. Preliminary results highlight the difficulties in evaluating the toxicity of this new and heterogeneous carbon nanoparticle family. A number of parameters including structure, size distribution and surface area, surface chemistry and surface charge, and agglomeration state as well as purity of the samples, have considerable impact on the reactivity of carbon nanotubes. However, available data clearly show that, under some conditions, nanotubes can cross the membrane barriers and suggests that if raw materials reach the organs they can induce harmful effects as inflammatory and fibrotic reactions. Therefore, many further studies on well-characterized materials are necessary to determine the safety of carbon nanotubes as well as their environmental impact.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 15 21%
Engineering 9 13%
Materials Science 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,451,284
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,226
of 4,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,752
of 400,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#117
of 405 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 405 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.