↓ Skip to main content

Cell Entry by Non-Enveloped Viruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 34: Rotavirus cell entry.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Rotavirus cell entry.
Chapter number 34
Book title
Cell Entry by Non-Enveloped Viruses
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/82_2010_34
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-213331-2, 978-3-64-213332-9, 978-3-64-213331-2, 978-3-64-213332-9
Authors

Matthew Baker, B. V. Venkataram Prasad, Baker M, Prasad BV

Abstract

Infecting nearly every child by age five, rotaviruses are the major causative agents of severe gastroenteritis in young children. While much is known about the structure of these nonenveloped viruses and their components, the exact mechanism of viral cell entry is still poorly understood. A consensus opinion that appears to be emerging from recent studies is that rotavirus cell entry involves a series of complex and coordinated events following proteolytic priming of the virus. Rotaviruses attach to the cell through sialic acid containing receptors, with integrins and Hsc70 acting as postattachment receptors, all localized on lipid rafts. Unlike other endocytotic mechanisms, this internalization pathway appears to be independent of clathrin or caveola. Equally complex and coordinated is the fascinating structural gymnastics of the VP4 spikes that are implicated in facilitating optimal interface between viral and host components. While these studies only begin to capture the basic cellular, molecular, and structural mechanisms of cell entry, the unusual features they have uncovered and many intriguing questions they have raised undoubtedly will prompt further investigations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Researcher 6 13%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,451,584
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#200
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,192
of 275,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.