You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Notch signaling and breast cancer.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 18 |
| Book title |
Notch Signaling in Embryology and Cancer
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4614-0899-4_18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4614-0898-7, 978-1-4614-0899-4
|
| Authors |
Michael Reedijk |
| Abstract |
It has been more than two decades since Notch has been identified as an oncogene in mouse mammary tumor virus-infected mice. Since this discovery, activated Notch signaling and up-regulation of tumor-promoting Notch target genes have been observed in human breast cancer. In addition, high expression of Notch ligands and receptors has been shown to correlate with poor outcome in this malignancy. Notch affects multiple cellular processes including stem cell maintenance, cell fate specification, differentiation, proliferation, motility and survival. Perturbation of these activities is a hallmark of carcinogenesis and evidence continues to accumulate that aberrant Notch activity influences breast cancer progression through these processes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 35% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 11% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,275
of 4,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,925
of 244,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#92
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.