↓ Skip to main content

Genomic subtypes of breast cancer identified by array-comparative genomic hybridization display distinct molecular and clinical characteristics

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genomic subtypes of breast cancer identified by array-comparative genomic hybridization display distinct molecular and clinical characteristics
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/bcr2596
Pubmed ID
Authors

Göran Jönsson, Johan Staaf, Johan Vallon-Christersson, Markus Ringnér, Karolina Holm, Cecilia Hegardt, Haukur Gunnarsson, Rainer Fagerholm, Carina Strand, Bjarni A Agnarsson, Outi Kilpivaara, Lena Luts, Päivi Heikkilä, Kristiina Aittomäki, Carl Blomqvist, Niklas Loman, Per Malmström, Håkan Olsson, Oskar Th Johannsson, Adalgeir Arason, Heli Nevanlinna, Rosa B Barkardottir, Åke Borg

Abstract

Breast cancer is a profoundly heterogeneous disease with respect to biologic and clinical behavior. Gene-expression profiling has been used to dissect this complexity and to stratify tumors into intrinsic gene-expression subtypes, associated with distinct biology, patient outcome, and genomic alterations. Additionally, breast tumors occurring in individuals with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations typically fall into distinct subtypes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 143 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 8 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 15%
Computer Science 5 3%
Mathematics 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 26 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,253,319
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#98
of 2,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,838
of 104,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.