↓ Skip to main content

DJ-1/PARK7 Protein

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: Protein Repair from Glycation by Glyoxals by the DJ-1 Family Maillard Deglycases
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Protein Repair from Glycation by Glyoxals by the DJ-1 Family Maillard Deglycases
Chapter number 9
Book title
DJ-1/PARK7 Protein
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-6583-5_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-106582-8, 978-9-81-106583-5
Authors

Mouadh Mihoub, Jad Abdallah, Gilbert Richarme, Mihoub, Mouadh, Abdallah, Jad, Richarme, Gilbert

Abstract

DJ-1 and its prokaryotic homologs, Hsp31, YhbO and YajL from Escherichia coli and PfpI from Pyrococcus furiosus, repair proteins from glycation by glyoxals (R-CO-CHO), which constitute their major glycating agents. Glycation is a non-enzymatic covalent reaction discovered by Louis Camille Maillard in 1912, between reactive carbonyls (reducing sugars and glyoxals) and amino acids (cysteine, arginine and lysine), which inactivates proteins. By degrading Maillard adducts formed between carbonyls and thiols or amino groups, the DJ-1 family Maillard deglycases prevent the formation of the so-called advanced glycation end products (AGEs) that arise from Maillard adducts after dehydrations, oxidations and rearrangements. Since glycation is involved in ageing, cancer, atherosclerosis and cataracts, as well as post-diabetic, neurovegetatives and renal and autoimmune diseases, the DJ-1 deglycases are likely to play an important role in preventing these diseases. These deglycases, especially those from thermophilic organisms, may also be used to prevent the formation of dietary AGEs during food processing, sterilization and storage. They also prevent acrylamide formation in food, likely by degrading the asparagine/glyoxal Maillard adducts responsible for its formation. Since Maillard adducts are the substrates of the DJ-1 family deglycases, we propose renaming them Maillard deglycases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 3 15%
Professor 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,577,751
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,324
of 4,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,468
of 421,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#333
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.