You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
A rational design process: How and why to fake it
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 6 |
| Book title |
Formal Methods and Software Development
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, May 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-15199-0_6 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-015199-9, 978-3-54-039307-8
|
| Authors |
David L. Parnas, Paul C. Clements, Parnas, David L., Clements, Paul C. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 345 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 3% |
| Germany | 11 | 3% |
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| Finland | 4 | 1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Unknown | 278 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 61 | 18% |
| Researcher | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 60 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 190 | 55% |
| Engineering | 36 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 20 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Design | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 43 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#14,508,511
of 24,344,498 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,073
of 8,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,226
of 59,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#40
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,344,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.