↓ Skip to main content

The academic tweet: Twitter as a tool to advance academic surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Surgical Research, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 5,517)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
338 tweeters
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The academic tweet: Twitter as a tool to advance academic surgery
Published in
Journal of Surgical Research, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather J. Logghe, Luke V. Selby, Marissa A. Boeck, Nikki L. Stamp, Jason Chuen, Christian Jones

Abstract

Social media, Twitter in particular, has emerged as an essential tool for surgeons. In the realm of academic surgery, it enables surgeons to advance the core values of academic surgery, as outlined by the Association for Academic Surgery: inclusion, leadership, innovation, scholarship, and mentorship. This article details the ways in which surgeons are using Twitter to embody these values and how the Twitter account for the Association of Academic Surgeons accomplishes its goal of inspiring and developing young academic surgeons.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 338 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 24 28%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 31%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 27 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2022.
All research outputs
#154,829
of 23,981,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Surgical Research
#11
of 5,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,727
of 333,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Surgical Research
#3
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,981,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,517 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.