You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chemical basis of egg cannibalism in a caterpillar (Utetheisa ornatrix)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chemical Ecology, November 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00987992 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Franz Bogner, Thomas Eisner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 27% |
| Researcher | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 18% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,351,871
of 25,085,000 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#166
of 2,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#929
of 17,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Ecology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.