↓ Skip to main content

Inferring Loss-of-Heterozygosity from Unpaired Tumors Using High-Density Oligonucleotide SNP Arrays

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inferring Loss-of-Heterozygosity from Unpaired Tumors Using High-Density Oligonucleotide SNP Arrays
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, May 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rameen Beroukhim, Ming Lin, Yuhyun Park, Ke Hao, Xiaojun Zhao, Levi A Garraway, Edward A Fox, Ephraim P Hochberg, Ingo K Mellinghoff, Matthias D Hofer, Aurelien Descazeaud, Mark A Rubin, Matthew Meyerson, Hung Wong, William R Sellers, Cheng Li

Abstract

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of chromosomal regions bearing tumor suppressors is a key event in the evolution of epithelial and mesenchymal tumors. Identification of these regions usually relies on genotyping tumor and counterpart normal DNA and noting regions where heterozygous alleles in the normal DNA become homozygous in the tumor. However, paired normal samples for tumors and cell lines are often not available. With the advent of oligonucleotide arrays that simultaneously assay thousands of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, genotyping can now be done at high enough resolution to allow identification of LOH events by the absence of heterozygous loci, without comparison to normal controls. Here we describe a hidden Markov model-based method to identify LOH from unpaired tumor samples, taking into account SNP intermarker distances, SNP-specific heterozygosity rates, and the haplotype structure of the human genome. When we applied the method to data genotyped on 100 K arrays, we correctly identified 99% of SNP markers as either retention or loss. We also correctly identified 81% of the regions of LOH, including 98% of regions greater than 3 megabases. By integrating copy number analysis into the method, we were able to distinguish LOH from allelic imbalance. Application of this method to data from a set of prostate samples without paired normals identified known regions of prevalent LOH. We have developed a method for analyzing high-density oligonucleotide SNP array data to accurately identify of regions of LOH and retention in tumors without the need for paired normal samples.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 5%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Belgium 3 3%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 91 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 10%
Other 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 13%
Computer Science 6 6%
Mathematics 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 9 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,452,627
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,153
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,775
of 81,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.