↓ Skip to main content

Malaria: Drugs, Disease and Post-genomic Biology

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Antimalarial multi-drug resistance in Asia: mechanisms and assessment.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Antimalarial multi-drug resistance in Asia: mechanisms and assessment.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Malaria: Drugs, Disease and Post-genomic Biology
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, November 2005
DOI 10.1007/3-540-29088-5_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-025363-1, 978-3-54-029088-9
Authors

Uhlemann AC, Krishna S, Uhlemann, A.-C., Krishna, S., A.-C. Uhlemann, S. Krishna

Abstract

The emergence and spread of drug-resistant parasites poses a major problem for management of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in endemic areas. Nowhere is this more apparent than in southeast Asia, where multi-drug resistance to chloroquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was exacerbated when mefloquine monotherapy began failing in the 1980s. A better understanding of mechanisms of (multi-) drug resistance is urgently warranted to monitor and guide antimalarial chemotherapy regimens more efficiently. Here we review recent advances on identification of molecular markers that can be employed in predicting in vitro and in vivo resistance in southeast Asia. Examples include amplification of PfMDR1 (P. falciparum multi-drug resistant gene 1) and mefloquine, K76T PfCRT and chloroquine, as well as mutations in the dihydroperoate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase genes and the antifolate class of drugs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 28%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Chemistry 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Computer Science 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,728,720
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#91
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,849
of 60,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them