↓ Skip to main content

Bioluminescence

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Bioluminescence'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Luminescent Probes and Visualization of Bioluminescence
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Validation of Bioluminescent Imaging Techniques
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Assessment of extracellular ATP concentrations.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 High-throughput quantitative bioluminescence imaging for assessing tumor burden.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Fluorescence Imaging of Tumors with “Smart” pH-Activatable Targeted Probes
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Bioluminescence
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Bioluminescent Imaging of Transplanted Islets
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Bioluminescence Reporter Gene Imaging of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Survival, Proliferation, and Fate
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Detection of Apoptosis Using Cyclic Luciferase in Living Mammals
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Noninvasive Bioluminescent Imaging of Infections
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Real-Time Bioluminescence Imaging of Viral Pathogenesis
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Bioluminescence
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Quantitative In Vivo Imaging of Non-viral-Mediated Gene Expression and RNAi-Mediated Knockdown
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Analysis of Protein–Protein Interactions Using Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Bioluminescent Imaging of MAPK Function with Intein-Mediated Reporter Gene Assay
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Bioluminescence Analysis of Smad-Dependent TGF-β Signaling in Live Mice
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Bioluminescence Imaging of Calcium Oscillations Inside Intracellular Organelles
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Novel Tools for Use in Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) Assays
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 PIN-G reporter for imaging and defining trafficking signals in membrane proteins.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Imaging β-Galactosidase Activity In Vivo Using Sequential Reporter-Enzyme Luminescence
Attention for Chapter 9: Detection of Apoptosis Using Cyclic Luciferase in Living Mammals
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Detection of Apoptosis Using Cyclic Luciferase in Living Mammals
Chapter number 9
Book title
Bioluminescence
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-321-3_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60327-320-6, 978-1-60327-321-3
Authors

Akira Kanno, Yoshio Umezawa, Takeaki Ozawa, Kanno, Akira, Umezawa, Yoshio, Ozawa, Takeaki

Abstract

Programmed cell death, apoptosis, is a crucial process involved in pathogenesis and progression of diseases, which is executed by cysteine aspartyl proteases (caspases). The caspase activities in living subjects and their regulation with small chemical compounds are of great interest for screening drug candidates or pathological agents. We describe a novel genetically encoded bioluminescent indicator for real-time imaging of caspase-3 activities in living cells and animals. The indicator is composed of an engineered firefly luciferase, of which the N- and C-terminal ends are linked with a substrate sequence of caspase-3 (Asp-Glu-Val-Asp). When activated caspase-3 digests the substrate sequence, the cyclized luciferase recovers its activity. The indicator provides a general means of evaluating effects of cytotoxic compounds or novel pharmacological chemicals and apoptosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Other 3 14%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Chemistry 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,304,580
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,318
of 13,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,735
of 169,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#127
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,088 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.