You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
A Predictive Performance Model for Stencil Codes on Multicore CPUs
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 40 |
Book title |
High Performance Computing for Computational Science - VECPAR 2012
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-38718-0_40 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-238717-3, 978-3-64-238718-0
|
Authors |
Andreas Schäfer, Dietmar Fey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 67% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#12,929,609
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#3,776
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,070
of 281,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#143
of 314 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 314 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.