↓ Skip to main content

The CRASH trial protocol (Corticosteroid randomisation after significant head injury) [74459797]

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The CRASH trial protocol (Corticosteroid randomisation after significant head injury) [74459797]
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, June 2001
DOI 10.1186/1471-227x-1-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

The CRASH trial management group

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, millions of people are treated each year for significant head injury. A substantial proportion die, and many more are disabled. If short term corticosteroid infusion could be reliably shown to reduce these risks by just a few percent then this might affect the treatment of a few hundred thousand patients a year, protecting thousands from death or long term disability. STUDY DESIGN: CRASH is a large simple, placebo-controlled trial of the effects of a 48-hour infusion of corticosteroids on death and on neurological disability, among adults with head injury and some impairment of consciousness. Head injured patients with impaired consciousness who are judged to be 16 years or older are eligible if the responsible doctor is, for any reason, substantially uncertain whether or not to use corticosteroids. ORGANISATION: The CRASH trial will determine reliably the effects on death and disability of a short corticosteroid infusion following significant head injury. To detect or refute improvements of only a few percent in outcome, many thousands of acute head injury patients must be randomised between control and steroid infusions. Such large numbers will be possible only if hundreds of doctors and nurses can collaborate in the participating emergency departments. Since they are busy, and working in emergency situations, the trial involves them in almost no extra work: no special investigations or changes to usual management are required, and data collection is absolutely minimal. The trial is on-going and new collaborators are welcome. Further information about the trial is available at http://www.crash.lshtm.ac.uk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 13 27%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 46%
Unspecified 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,208,858
of 24,877,044 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#381
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,770
of 41,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,877,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them