↓ Skip to main content

Regional Brain Stem Atrophy in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease Detected by Anatomical MRI

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regional Brain Stem Atrophy in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease Detected by Anatomical MRI
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Jubault, Simona M. Brambati, Clotilde Degroot, Benoît Kullmann, Antonio P. Strafella, Anne-Louise Lafontaine, Sylvain Chouinard, Oury Monchi

Abstract

Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the dysfunction of dopaminergic dependent cortico-basal ganglia loops and diagnosed on the basis of motor symptoms (tremors and/or rigidity and bradykinesia). Post-mortem studies tend to show that the destruction of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra constitutes an intermediate step in a broader neurodegenerative process rather than a unique feature of Parkinson's disease, as a consistent pattern of progression would exist, originating from the medulla oblongata/pontine tegmentum. To date, neuroimaging techniques have been unable to characterize the pre-symptomatic stages of PD. However, if such a regular neurodegenerative pattern were to exist, consistent damages would be found in the brain stem, even at early stages of the disease. We recruited 23 PD patients at Hoenn and Yahr stages I to II of the disease and 18 healthy controls (HC) matched for age. T1-weighted anatomical scans were acquired (MPRAGE, 1 mm3 resolution) and analyzed using an optimized VBM protocol to detect white and grey matter volume reduction without spatial a priori. When the HC group was compared to the PD group, a single cluster exhibited statistical difference (p<0.05 corrected for false detection rate, 4287 mm3) in the brain stem, between the pons and the medulla oblongata. The present study provides in-vivo evidence that brain stem damage may be the first identifiable stage of PD neuropathology, and that the identification of this consistent damage along with other factors could help with earlier diagnosis in the future. This damage could also explain some non-motor symptoms in PD that often precede diagnosis, such as autonomic dysfunction and sleep disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Professor 7 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 23%
Neuroscience 23 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 11%
Engineering 8 6%
Psychology 8 6%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 30 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,765
of 194,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,446
of 165,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#290
of 569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.