↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol. 173

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: Cannabinoids as Modulators of Cell Death: Clinical Applications and Future Directions
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Cannabinoids as Modulators of Cell Death: Clinical Applications and Future Directions
Chapter number 3
Book title
Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol. 173
Published in
Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/112_2017_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-961366-6, 978-3-31-961367-3
Authors

Fonseca, B. M., Teixeira, N. A., Correia-da-Silva, G., B. M. Fonseca, N. A. Teixeira, G. Correia-da-Silva

Abstract

Endocannabinoids are bioactive lipids that modulate various physiological processes through G-protein-coupled receptors (CB1 and CB2) and other putative targets. By sharing the activation of the same receptors, some phytocannabinoids and a multitude of synthetic cannabinoids mimic the effects of endocannabinoids. In recent years, a growing interest has been dedicated to the study of cannabinoids properties for their analgesic, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. In addition to these well-recognized effects, various studies suggest that cannabinoids may affect cell survival, cell proliferation or cell death. These observations indicate that cannabinoids may play an important role in the regulation of cellular homeostasis and, thus, may contribute to tissue remodelling and cancer treatment. For a long time, the study of cannabinoid receptor signalling has been focused on the classical adenylyl cyclase/cyclic AMP/protein kinase A (PKA) pathway. However, this pathway does not totally explain the wide array of biological responses to cannabinoids. In addition, the diversity of receptors and signalling pathways that endocannabinoids modulate offers an interesting opportunity for the development of specific molecules to disturb selectively the endogenous system. Moreover, emerging evidences suggest that cannabinoids ability to limit cell proliferation and to induce tumour-selective cell death may offer a novel strategy in cancer treatment. This review describes the main properties of cannabinoids in cell death and attempts to clarify the different pathways triggered by these compounds that may help to understand the complexity of respective molecular mechanisms and explore the potential clinical benefit of cannabinoids use in cancer therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 17 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,466,289
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology
#11
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,247
of 310,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them