↓ Skip to main content

Heterogeneity in Asthma

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Heterogeneity in Asthma'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Introduction to asthma and phenotyping.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Epidemiology of asthma: prevalence and burden of disease.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Heterogeneity of asthma in society.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Inhaled environmental allergens and toxicants as determinants of the asthma phenotype.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Current clinical diagnostic tests for asthma.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Management of Asthma: The Current US and European Guidelines.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Community-based interventions in asthma.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Heterogeneity of response to therapy.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Introduction to genetics and genomics in asthma: genetics of asthma.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Gene expression profiling in asthma.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Asthma epigenetics.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Overview.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Metabolomics in Asthma
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Proteomic Analysis of the Asthmatic Airway
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Measurement of the innate immune response in the airway.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Functional proteomics for the characterization of impaired cellular responses to glucocorticoids in asthma.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Asthma Phenotypes
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Role of Visual Analytics in Asthma Phenotyping and Biomarker Discovery
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Central nervous system influences in asthma.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Asthma, culture, and cultural analysis: continuing challenges.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Conclusions and future directions.
Attention for Chapter 6: Management of Asthma: The Current US and European Guidelines.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Management of Asthma: The Current US and European Guidelines.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Heterogeneity in Asthma
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8603-9_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-8602-2, 978-1-4614-8603-9
Authors

Reddy AP, Gupta MR, Ashwini P. Reddy, Meera R. Gupta, Reddy, Ashwini P., Gupta, Meera R.

Abstract

Asthma management guidelines aim to improve the implementation of current knowledge into daily clinical practice by establishing a consensus of scientific practices for the management of asthma. Initial guidelines were based on consensus of expert opinion in order to employ a severity-based classification system as a guide to treatment. However, advances in asthma research led to the development of evidence-based guidelines and a major paradigm shift to control-based asthma management. Control-based management is central to the published guidelines developed by The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), and The British Thoracic Society (BTS), each one using the same volume of evidence but emphasizing aspects particular to their specific patient populations and socioeconomic needs. This chapter summarizes the evolution of these guidelines and summarizes the key points and evidence used in the recommendations for the assessment, monitoring, and management of asthma in all ages, with particular emphasis on the NHLBI guidelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Student > Postgraduate 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 42%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2014.
All research outputs
#14,781,203
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,258
of 4,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,930
of 212,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#17
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.