↓ Skip to main content

Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Merits and Limits of Tractography Techniques for the Uninitiated.
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Merits and Limits of Tractography Techniques for the Uninitiated.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Advances and Technical Standards in Neurosurgery
Published in
Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-21359-0_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-921358-3, 978-3-31-921359-0
Authors

Nimsky, Christopher, Bauer, Miriam, Carl, Barbara, Christopher Nimsky, Miriam Bauer, Barbara Carl

Abstract

The implementation of fiber tracking or tractography modules in commercial navigation systems resulted in a broad availability of visualization possibilities for major white matter tracts in the neurosurgical community. Unfortunately the implemented algorithms and tracking approaches do not represent the state of the art of tractography strategies and may lead to false tracking results. The application of advanced tractography techniques for neurosurgical procedures poses even additional challenges that relate to effects of the individual anatomy that might be altered by edema and tumor, to stereotactic inaccuracies due to image distortion, as well as to registration inaccuracies and brain shift.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Engineering 3 8%
Psychology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 26%