↓ Skip to main content

Model Driven Architecture – Foundations and Applications

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Model Driven Architecture – Foundations and Applications'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 A Model-Driven Architectural Framework for Integration-Capable Enterprise Application Product Lines
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Systems Integration Methodology Based on MDA
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 From Analysis Model to Software Architecture: A PIM2PIM Mapping
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 MDA Approach for Maintenance of Business Applications
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Definition and Generation of Data Exchange Formats in AUTOSAR
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 A Model Driven Approach to Engineering of Flexible Manufacturing System Control Software
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 MDD Maturity Model: A Roadmap for Introducing Model-Driven Development
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 A Process Framework for the Successful Adoption of Model Driven Development
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Finding a Path to Model Consistency
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Dynamic Logic Semantics for UML Consistency
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 The Epsilon Object Language (EOL)
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Using a Model Merging Language for Reconciling Model Versions
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 RubyTL: A Practical, Extensible Transformation Language
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 MCC: A Model Transformation Environment
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Model Driven Integration Architecture for Ontology-Based Context Modelling and Context-Aware Application Development
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Ontology-Based Composition and Transformation for Model-Driven Service Architecture
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Harvesting Software Systems for MDA-Based Reengineering
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 A Methodology for Database Reengineering to Web Services
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Business Process Modeling: Defining Domain Specific Modeling Languages by Use of UML Profiles
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Constraint Support in MDA Tools: A Survey
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Automatic Generation of Modelling Tools
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Model Driven Development of Multi-Agent Systems
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Limes: An Aspect-Oriented Constraint Checking Language
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 An Algebraic Specification of Generic OCL Queries Within the Eclipse Modeling Framework
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 A Comparison of Configuration Techniques for Model Transformations
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 A Canonical Scheme for Model Composition
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 MOFLON: A Standard-Compliant Metamodeling Framework with Graph Transformations
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Mutation Analysis Testing for Model Transformations
Attention for Chapter 11: The Epsilon Object Language (EOL)
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Epsilon Object Language (EOL)
Chapter number 11
Book title
Model Driven Architecture – Foundations and Applications
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, July 2006
DOI 10.1007/11787044_11
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-035909-8, 978-3-54-035910-4
Authors

Dimitrios S. Kolovos, Richard F. Paige, Fiona A. C. Polack

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 3%
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
Colombia 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
China 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 51 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 31%
Student > Master 15 23%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 53 82%
Engineering 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Unknown 6 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2015.
All research outputs
#18,376,927
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#6,007
of 8,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,674
of 65,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.