↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology 166

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 17: The Role of mTORC1 in Regulating Protein Synthesis and Skeletal Muscle Mass in Response to Various Mechanical Stimuli.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Role of mTORC1 in Regulating Protein Synthesis and Skeletal Muscle Mass in Response to Various Mechanical Stimuli.
Chapter number 17
Book title
Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology 166
Published in
Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/112_2013_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-904905-2, 978-3-31-904906-9
Authors

Craig A Goodman, Craig A. Goodman, Goodman, Craig A.

Abstract

Skeletal muscle plays a fundamental role in mobility, disease prevention, and quality of life. Skeletal muscle mass is, in part, determined by the rates of protein synthesis, and mechanical loading is a major regulator of protein synthesis and skeletal muscle mass. The mammalian/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), found in the multi-protein complex, mTORC1, is proposed to play an essential role in the regulation of protein synthesis and skeletal muscle mass. The purpose of this review is to examine the function of mTORC1 in relation to protein synthesis and cell growth, the current evidence from rodent and human studies for the activation of mTORC1 signaling by different types of mechanical stimuli, whether mTORC1 signaling is necessary for changes in protein synthesis and skeletal muscle mass that occur in response to different types of mechanical stimuli, and the proposed molecular signaling mechanisms that may be responsible for the mechanical activation of mTORC1 signaling.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 18%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 25 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 26 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2014.
All research outputs
#3,807,988
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology
#8
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,635
of 308,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them