↓ Skip to main content

Haemostasis

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Haemostasis'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 The Coagulation System in Humans
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Platelet Physiology
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 The Role of the Vessel Wall
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Specimen Requirements for the Haemostasis Laboratory
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Methods of Coagulation
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Reference Ranges of Coagulation Tests
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Lupus Anticoagulant Testing
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Prothrombin Time/International Normalized Ratio
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Thrombin Clotting Time
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Thrombin Generation
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Activated Clotting Time (ACT)
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Factor XIII Assays
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Fibrinogen
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Platelet Counting
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Platelet Morphology Analysis
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Light Transmission Aggregometry
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Platelet Flow Cytometry
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) assay.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Reptilase Time (RT)
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Protamine titration.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Laboratory Methods for the Assay of Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor in Human Plasma
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Nijmegen-Bethesda Assay to Measure Factor VIII Inhibitors
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Kaolin clotting time.
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 The Dilute Russell’s Viper Venom Time
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Platelet Neutralization Test
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Antithrombin
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 Protein C
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 Protein S
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Testing for Hyperhomocysteinemia in Subjects with a History of Thromboembolic Events Using HPLC Technique
  33. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 32 Anticardiolipin Antibody and Anti-beta 2 Glycoprotein I Antibody Assays
  34. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 33 Testing for Apolipoprotein(a) Phenotype Using Isoelectric Focusing and Immunoblotting Technique
  35. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 34 D-Dimer and Fibrinogen/Fibrin Degradation Products
Attention for Chapter 25: Kaolin clotting time.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Kaolin clotting time.
Chapter number 25
Book title
Haemostasis
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-339-8_25
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-338-1, 978-1-62703-339-8
Authors

Kottayam Radhakrishnan, Radhakrishnan, Kottayam

Abstract

The kaolin clotting time (KCT) is a sensitive test used in the laboratory detection of lupus anticoagulants (LA) (Derksen and de Groot, Thromb Res 114:521-526, 2004). It is essentially an activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) test with no added phospholipid. Kaolin acts as the activator in the KCT. In the absence of additional phospholipid reagent, the quality of the test sample is extremely important since the generation of thrombin completely depends on the presence of residual cell membranes and plasma lipids (Derksen and de Groot, Thromb Res 114:521-526, 2004). Since the test contains no exogenous phospholipid, a confirmatory test using excess phospholipid is required to confirm the presence of lupus anticoagulant in the sample (Court, Br J Biomed Sci 54:287-298, 1997).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,454,951
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,318
of 13,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,162
of 199,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#10
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.