↓ Skip to main content

Bioinformatics Methods in Clinical Research

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Machine Learning: An Indispensable Tool in Bioinformatics
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Machine Learning: An Indispensable Tool in Bioinformatics
Chapter number 2
Book title
Bioinformatics Methods in Clinical Research
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-194-3_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-60327-193-6, 978-1-60327-194-3
Authors

Iñaki Inza, Borja Calvo, Rubén Armañanzas, Endika Bengoetxea, Pedro Larrañaga, José A. Lozano, Inza, Iñaki, Calvo, Borja, Armañanzas, Rubén, Bengoetxea, Endika, Larrañaga, Pedro, Lozano, José A.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 106 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 25%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 33 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Engineering 7 6%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,505,836
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,403
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,521
of 165,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#88
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.