↓ Skip to main content

Confocal Microscopy

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Confocal Microscopy'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Reflecting on Confocal Microscopy: A Personal Perspective
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy: History, Applications, and Related Optical Sectioning Techniques
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Confocal microscopy on the internet.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Using Photoshop with Images Created by a Confocal System
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Clearing Up the Signal: Spectral Imaging and Linear Unmixing in Fluorescence Microscopy
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Low Magnification Confocal Microscopy of Tumor Angiogenesis
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Confocal imaging of butterfly tissue.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Confocal Microscopy of Cardiac Myocytes
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Confocal imaging of fluorescently labeled proteins in the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Confocal imaging and three-dimensional visualization of thick autofluorescent specimens.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Vital Imaging of Multicellular Spheroids
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Live confocal analysis of mutant- and drug-treated Drosophila embryos.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Confocal Imaging of the Microtubule Cytoskeleton in C. elegans Embryos and Germ Cells
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Measurement in the Confocal Microscope
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Method for Quantifying Blood Flow Distribution Among the Alveoli of the Lung
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Imaging Tools for Analysis of the Ureteric Tree in the Developing Mouse Kidney
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Evaluating Confocal Microscopy System Performance
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Erratum
Attention for Chapter 12: Live confocal analysis of mutant- and drug-treated Drosophila embryos.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Live confocal analysis of mutant- and drug-treated Drosophila embryos.
Chapter number 12
Book title
Confocal Microscopy
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-847-8_12
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-58829-351-0, 978-1-60761-847-8
Authors

Barbara Fasulo, William Sullivan, Fasulo, Barbara, Sullivan, William

Abstract

The model organism Drosophila melanogaster is particularly well suited for live image analysis. The availability of GFP transgenic flies and a wide array of fluorescent probes, in conjunction with laser scanning confocal microscopy, allow us to image multiple aspects of the cell cycle simultaneously. Confocal microscopy provides the sensitivity and resolution to observe the dynamics of specific cellular events in real time. For example, GFP-histone and rhodamine-labeled tubulin enable one to follow specific nuclear and cytoskeletal events including nuclear envelope formation, nuclear envelope breakdown, spindle formation, centrosome duplication, separation and migration, chromosomes condensation, and segregation. This analysis permits a detailed morphological and temporal description of nuclear and cytoskeletal events in normal or drug-injected embryos.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 16%
United States 1 5%
Unknown 15 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Professor 5 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 47%
Psychology 2 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Chemistry 2 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2014.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,199
of 13,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,464
of 309,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#303
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,410 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.