↓ Skip to main content

Metastasis Research Protocols

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Metastasis Research Protocols'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 In Vitro Invasion Assay Using Matrigel™: A Reconstituted Basement Membrane Preparation
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Single Cell and Spheroid Collagen Type I Invasion Assay
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Rocking Adhesion Assay System to Study Adhesion and Transendothelial Migration of Cancer Cells
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Cell Adhesion on E- and P-Selectin Under Physiological Flow Conditions.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Adhesion of Tumor Cells to Matrices and Endothelium
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Cell Aggregation Assays
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Chick Heart Invasion Assay
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Computer Simulation of the Metastatic Progression
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Theoretical Considerations in Using Animal Models of Metastasis and Brief Methodology for In Vivo Colorectal Cancer Models in SCID and Nude Mice
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Syngeneic Murine Metastasis Models: B16 Melanoma
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Imageable Clinically Relevant Mouse Models of Metastasis
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Imaging metastatic cell trafficking at the cellular level in vivo with fluorescent proteins.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Ultrasound Techniques for the Detection of Tumors and Metastases in Small Animals
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 The PFP/RAG2 Double-Knockout Mouse in Metastasis Research: Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Prostate Cancer.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Ultrasound-Guided Intracardial Injection and In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Single Cells in Mice as a Paradigm for Hematogenous Metastases.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Metastases in Xenograft Mouse Models of Cancer
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Spontaneous and Experimental Metastasis Models: Nude Mice
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Identifying the Origin and Phenotype of Cells in Tumor Xenografts
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Erratum
Attention for Chapter 14: The PFP/RAG2 Double-Knockout Mouse in Metastasis Research: Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Prostate Cancer.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The PFP/RAG2 Double-Knockout Mouse in Metastasis Research: Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Prostate Cancer.
Chapter number 14
Book title
Metastasis Research Protocols
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8244-4_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4614-8243-7, 978-1-4614-8244-4
Authors

Imke Müller, Sebastian Ullrich, Müller, Imke, Ullrich, Sebastian

Abstract

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and prostate cancer (PCa) as well as other solid tumors may have micro- or macro-metastatic spread at an early stage of the disease. SCLC and PCa xenograft transfer models in immunodeficient mice fail to model this metastatic spread in vivo. In both tumor types the depletion of NK cells found in immunodeficient mice results in an increased number of spontaneous metastases, mirroring the clinical situation where NK cell activity in patients is related to metastatic spread of the disease. As a result NK cell activity directly influences treatment options and mortality. Newly developed immunodeficient mouse strains lacking functional T- and B-cells (rag2 knockout) however presenting functional NK cells (perforin knockout) are superior in producing spontaneous metastasis of SCLC and PCa cells compared to the system using SCID mice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 27%
Other 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2013.
All research outputs
#18,349,805
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,858
of 13,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,267
of 305,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#293
of 594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,085 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.