↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory Health

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 134: Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Advanced Lung Cancer Patients During Chemotherapy
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Advanced Lung Cancer Patients During Chemotherapy
Chapter number 134
Book title
Respiratory Health
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/5584_2015_134
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-918792-1, 978-3-31-918793-8
Authors

Jastrzębski, D, Maksymiak, M, Kostorz, S, Bezubka, B, Osmanska, I, Młynczak, T, Rutkowska, A, Baczek, Z, Ziora, D, Kozielski, J, D. Jastrzębski, M. Maksymiak, S. Kostorz, B. Bezubka, I. Osmanska, T. Młynczak, A. Rutkowska, Z. Baczek, D. Ziora, J. Kozielski, Jastrzębski, D., Maksymiak, M., Kostorz, S., Bezubka, B., Osmanska, I., Młynczak, T., Rutkowska, A., Baczek, Z., Ziora, D., Kozielski, J.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of pulmonary rehabilitation for improving of exercises efficiency, dyspnea, and quality of life of patients with lung cancer during chemotherapy. After the enrollment selection, the study included 20 patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer and performance status 0-2. There were 12 patients randomly allocated to the pulmonary rehabilitation group and another 8 constituted the control group that did not undergo physical rehabilitation. Both groups of patients had continual cycles of chemotherapy. Data were analyzed before and after 8 weeks of physical rehabilitation, and before and after 8 weeks of observation without rehabilitation in controls. The inpatient rehabilitation program was based on exercise training with ski poles and respiratory muscle training. We found an increase in mobility (6 Minute Walk Test: 527.3 vs. 563.4 m; p > 0.05) and forced expired volume in 1 s (66.9 ± 13.2 vs. 78.4 ± 17.7 %predicted; p = 0.016), less dyspnea (p = 0.05), and a tendency for improvement in the general quality of life questionnaire after completion of pulmonary rehabilitation as compared with the control group. This report suggests that pulmonary rehabilitation in advanced lung cancer patients during chemotherapy is a beneficial intervention to reduce dyspnea and enhance the quality of life and mobility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 89 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 21%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 3 3%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 28 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 18%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2016.
All research outputs
#14,228,602
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,096
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,298
of 266,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.