You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Super-Eddington black hole accretion: Polish doughnuts and slim disks
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 49 |
Book title |
Growing Black Holes: Accretion in a Cosmological Context
|
Published in |
arXiv, November 2004
|
DOI | 10.1007/11403913_49 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-025275-7, 978-3-54-031639-8
|
Authors |
M.A. Abramowicz, Abramowicz, M.A. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 43% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
Professor | 1 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,871,318
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#52,561
of 934,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,962
of 58,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#19
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 934,961 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.