↓ Skip to main content

Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Automated Learning of Probabilistic Assumptions for Compositional Reasoning
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 An Interface Theory for Service-Oriented Design
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 rt-Inconsistency: A New Property for Real-Time Requirements
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Automatic Flow Analysis for Event-B
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Semantic Quality Attributes for Big-Step Modelling Languages
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Formalizing and Operationalizing Industrial Standards
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Modelling Non-linear Crowd Dynamics in Bio-PEPA
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Smart Reduction
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Uniform Monte-Carlo Model Checking
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Model Checking Büchi Pushdown Systems
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Modeling with Plausibility Checking: Inspecting Favorable and Critical Signs for Consistency between Control Flow and Functional Behavior
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Models within Models: Taming Model Complexity Using the Sub-model Lattice
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Type-Safe Evolution of Spreadsheets
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A Formal Resolution Strategy for Operation-Based Conflicts in Model Versioning Using Graph Modifications
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 A Step-Wise Approach for Integrating QoS throughout Software Development
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Systematic Development of UMLsec Design Models Based on Security Requirements
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Theoretical Aspects of Compositional Symbolic Execution
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Testing Container Classes: Random or Systematic?
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Seamless Testing for Models and Code
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Retrofitting Unit Tests for Parameterized Unit Testing
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Evolving a Test Oracle in Black-Box Testing
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Automated Driver Generation for Analysis of Web Applications
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 On Model-Based Regression Testing of Web-Services Using Dependency Analysis of Visual Contracts
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Incremental Clone Detection and Elimination for Erlang Programs
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Analyzing Software Updates: Should You Build a Dynamic Updating Infrastructure?
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 Flow-Augmented Call Graph: A New Foundation for Taming API Complexity
  29. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 28 Search-Based Design Defects Detection by Example
  30. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 29 An Empirical Study on Evolution of API Documentation
  31. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 30 An Empirical Study of Long-Lived Code Clones
  32. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 31 Where the Truth Lies: AOP and Its Impact on Software Modularity
Attention for Chapter 30: An Empirical Study of Long-Lived Code Clones
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
An Empirical Study of Long-Lived Code Clones
Chapter number 30
Book title
Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-19811-3_30
Book ISBNs
978-3-64-219810-6, 978-3-64-219811-3
Authors

Dongxiang Cai, Miryung Kim, Cai, Dongxiang, Kim, Miryung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Czechia 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 30 77%
Psychology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2012.
All research outputs
#23,011,330
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#7,044
of 8,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,022
of 191,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#276
of 315 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 315 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.