↓ Skip to main content

Phosphoinositides and Disease

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 11: Nuclear PI-PLC β1 and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: From Bench to Clinics
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Nuclear PI-PLC β1 and Myelodysplastic Syndromes: From Bench to Clinics
Chapter number 11
Book title
Phosphoinositides and Disease
Published in
Current topics in microbiology and immunology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-5025-8_11
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-075024-1, 978-9-40-075025-8
Authors

Sara Mongiorgi, Matilde Y. Follo, Cristina Clissa, Roberto Giardino, Milena Fini, Lucia Manzoli, Giulia Ramazzotti, Roberta Fiume, Carlo Finelli, Lucio Cocco, Mongiorgi, Sara, Follo, Matilde Y., Clissa, Cristina, Giardino, Roberto, Fini, Milena, Manzoli, Lucia, Ramazzotti, Giulia, Fiume, Roberta, Finelli, Carlo, Cocco, Lucio

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), clonal hematopoietic stem-cell disorders mainly affecting older adult patients, show ineffective hematopoiesis in one or more of the lineages of the bone marrow. A number of MDS progresses to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with the involvement of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms affecting PI-PLC β1. The molecular mechanisms underlying the MDS evolution to AML are still unclear, even though it is now clear that the nuclear signaling elicited by PI-PLC β1, Cyclin D3, and Akt plays an important role in the control of the balance between cell cycle progression and apoptosis in both normal and pathologic conditions. Moreover, a correlation between other PI-PLCs, such as PI-PLC β3, kinases and phosphatases has been postulated in MDS pathogenesis. Here, we review the findings hinting at the role of nuclear lipid signaling pathways in MDS, which could become promising therapeutic targets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 45%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 55%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,336,865
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#524
of 672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,883
of 396,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in microbiology and immunology
#35
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.