↓ Skip to main content

I Domain Integrins

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 7: Integrin αEβ7: Molecular Features and Functional Significance in the Immune System.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Integrin αEβ7: Molecular Features and Functional Significance in the Immune System.
Chapter number 7
Book title
I Domain Integrins
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9153-3_7
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-40-179152-6, 978-9-40-179153-3
Authors

Hadley GA, Higgins JM, Gregg A. Hadley, Jonathan M. G. Higgins, Hadley, Gregg A., Higgins, Jonathan M. G.

Abstract

Alpha E beta 7 (αEβ7) is an α-I domain-containing integrin that is highly expressed by a variety of leukocyte populations at mucosal sites including intraepithelial T cells, dendritic cells, mast cells, and T regulatory cells (Treg). Expression depends largely or solely on transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) isoforms. The best characterized ligand for αEβ7 is E-cadherin on epithelial cells, though there is evidence of a second ligand in the human system. An exposed acidic residue on the distal aspect of E-cadherin domain 1 interacts with the MIDAS site in the αE α-I domain. By binding to E-cadherin, αEβ7 contributes to mucosal specific retention of leukocytes within epithelia. Studies on αE knockout mice have identified an additional important function for this integrin in allograft rejection and have also indicated that it may have a role in immunoregulation. Recent studies point to a multifaceted role for αEβ7 in regulating both innate and acquired immune responses to foreign antigen.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2014.
All research outputs
#20,242,779
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,955
of 4,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,357
of 226,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#39
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.