You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Induction and quantification of neutrophil extracellular traps.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 20 |
| Book title |
Neutrophil Methods and Protocols
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-845-4_20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-844-7, 978-1-62703-845-4
|
| Authors |
Gonzalez AS, Bardoel BW, Harbort CJ, Zychlinsky A, Alejandro Sanchez Gonzalez, Bart W. Bardoel, Christopher J. Harbort, Arturo Zychlinsky, Gonzalez, Alejandro Sanchez, Bardoel, Bart W., Harbort, Christopher J., Zychlinsky, Arturo |
| Abstract |
Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation is a recently discovered process in the field of innate immunity. It is important to have consistent standards in inducing and quantifying NET formation to compare data from different labs in this new area of investigation. Here we describe the conditions of neutrophil isolation from peripheral blood and stimulation that we find allow the study of NETosis in vitro. The criteria for conclusively identifying the process of NETosis, and the pros and cons of various quantification methods are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,239,689
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,865
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,328
of 310,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#436
of 654 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 654 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.