↓ Skip to main content

Cell Separation

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 73: Flow cytometry and cell sorting.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
529 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Flow cytometry and cell sorting.
Chapter number 73
Book title
Cell Separation
Published in
Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/10_2007_073
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-54-075262-2, 978-3-54-075263-9
Authors

Ibrahim SF, van den Engh G, Sherrif F. Ibrahim, Ger van den Engh, Ibrahim, Sherrif F., Engh, Ger

Abstract

Flow cytometry and cell sorting are well-established technologies in clinical diagnostics and biomedical research. Heterogeneous mixtures of cells are placed in suspension and passed single file across one or more laser interrogation points. Light signals emitted from the particles are collected and correlated to entities such as cell morphology, surface and intracellular protein expression, gene expression, and cellular physiology. Based on user-defined parameters, individual cells can then be diverted from the fluid stream and collected into viable, homogeneous fractions at exceptionally high speeds and a purity that approaches 100%. As such, the cell sorter becomes the launching point for numerous downstream studies. Flow cytometry is a cornerstone in clinical diagnostics, and cheaper, more versatile machines are finding their way into widespread and varied uses. In addition, advances in computing and optics have led to a new generation of flow cytometers capable of processing cells at orders of magnitudes faster than their predecessors, and with staggering degrees of complexity, making the cytometer a powerful discovery tool in biotechnology. This chapter will begin with a discussion of basic principles of flow cytometry and cell sorting, including a technical description of factors that contribute to the performance of these instruments. The remaining sections will then be divided into clinical- and research-based applications of flow cytometry and cell sorting, highlighting salient studies that illustrate the versatility of this indispensable technology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 529 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 516 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 106 20%
Student > Master 100 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 89 17%
Researcher 58 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 4%
Other 54 10%
Unknown 100 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 118 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 8%
Engineering 33 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 5%
Other 86 16%
Unknown 111 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,668,611
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#55
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,173
of 69,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in biochemical engineering biotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them