↓ Skip to main content

Respiratory System Diseases

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 204: Stress Response, Brain Noradrenergic System and Cognition
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Stress Response, Brain Noradrenergic System and Cognition
Chapter number 204
Book title
Respiratory System Diseases
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/5584_2016_204
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-959497-2, 978-3-31-959498-9, 978-3-31-959497-2, 978-3-31-959498-9
Authors

Pawel J. Winklewski, Marek Radkowski, Magdalena Wszedybyl-Winklewska, Urszula Demkow, Winklewski, Pawel J., Radkowski, Marek, Wszedybyl-Winklewska, Magdalena, Demkow, Urszula

Abstract

Locus coeruleus is a critical component of the brain noradrenergic system. The brain noradrenergic system provides the neural substrate for the architecture supporting the interaction with, and navigation through, an external world complexity. Changes in locus coeruleus tonic and phasic activity and the interplay between norepinephrine and α1- and α2-adrenoceptors in the prefrontal cortex are the key elements of this sophisticated architecture. In this narrative review we discuss how the brain noradrenergic system is affected by increased exposure to corticotropin-releasing hormone triggered by stress response. In particular, we present the mechanisms responsible for thinking inflexibility often observed under highly stressful conditions. Finally, the main directions for future research are highlighted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 18%
Neuroscience 2 12%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,554,389
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,323
of 4,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,308
of 421,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#333
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.