You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Kinesia Paradoxa: A Challenging Parkinson’s Phenomenon for Simulation
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 18 |
| Book title |
GeNeDis 2014
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-08927-0_18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-908926-3, 978-3-31-908927-0
|
| Authors |
Eirini Banou, Banou, Eirini |
| Abstract |
The present work aims to study extensively the literature on the phenomenon of "kinesia paradoxa" presented in Parkinson's disease patients, who generally cannot move but under certain circumstances exhibit a sudden, brief period of mobility (walking or even running). The objective of this study was to identify the mechanisms causing this phenomenon and relate them with respectively computational simulations aiming to draw attention to gaps and weaknesses and possible directions for future research. The study of this phenomenon with the use of modeling techniques may be a decisive factor for its interpretation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
| Psychology | 7 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 16% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,944,246
of 22,771,140 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,108
of 4,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,496
of 400,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#104
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,771,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.