You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
An Animal Model of Alzheimer Disease Based on the Intrahippocampal Injection of Amyloid β-Peptide (1–42)
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 25 |
| Book title |
Neurotrophic Factors
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-7571-6_25 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-7570-9, 978-1-4939-7571-6
|
| Authors |
Roberta Facchinetti, Maria Rosanna Bronzuoli, Caterina Scuderi, Facchinetti, Roberta, Bronzuoli, Maria Rosanna, Scuderi, Caterina |
| Abstract |
The intrahippocampal injection of amyloid beta peptide (1-42) (Aβ(1-42)) represents one of the most useful animal models of Alzheimer disease. Since none of these available models fully represents the main pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer disease, stereotaxic Aβ(1-42) infusion provides researchers with an in vivo alternative paradigm. When performed by well-trained individuals, this model is the best-suited one for short-term studies focusing on the effects of Aβ(1-42) on a specific brain region or circuitry. Here, we describe all methodological phases of such a model. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 12 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,030,867
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,112
of 13,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,232
of 442,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#204
of 1,498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.