↓ Skip to main content

Apoptosis and Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Apoptosis and Cancer'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Caspase-3 activation is a critical determinant of genotoxic stress-induced apoptosis.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Flow Cytometry Enumeration of Apoptotic Cancer Cells by Apoptotic Rate
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 “Multiplexed Viability, Cytotoxicity, and Caspase Activity Assays”
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Multiplexed Method for Kinetic Measurements of Apoptosis and Proliferation Using Live-Content Imaging
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Detection of End-Stage Apoptosis by ApopTag ® TUNEL Technique
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Detection and Quantification of Apoptosis in Primary Cells Using Taqman ® Protein Assay
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Detection of p53 Protein Aggregation in Cancer Cell Lines and Tumor Samples
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Detection of p53 Protein Transcriptional Activity by Chromatin Immunoprecipitation.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Homogeneous, Bioluminescent Proteasome Assays
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Laser Capture Microdissection for Gene Expression Analysis
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Using the Peggy Simple Western System for Fine Needle Aspirate Analysis
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Analysis of Autophagosome Formation Using Lentiviral Biosensors for Live Fluorescent Cellular Imaging
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Optical Imaging of Ovarian Cancer Using HER-2 Affibody Conjugated Nanoparticles.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Measuring Cardiac Autophagic Flux In Vitro and In Vivo
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 PET Imaging for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Biodistribution in Mice
Attention for Chapter 10: Laser Capture Microdissection for Gene Expression Analysis
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Laser Capture Microdissection for Gene Expression Analysis
Chapter number 10
Book title
Apoptosis and Cancer
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1661-0_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-1660-3, 978-1-4939-1661-0
Authors

Mallikarjun Bidarimath, Andrew K Edwards, Chandrakant Tayade, Andrew K. Edwards

Abstract

Laser capture microdissection (LCM) is an excellent and perhaps the only platform to isolate homogeneous cell populations from specific microscopic regions of heterogeneous tissue section, under direct microscopic visualization. The basic operations of the LCM system are based on (a) microscopic visualization of phenotypically identified cells of interest, (b) selective adherence of cells to a melting thermolabile film/membrane using a low-energy infrared laser (IR system) or photovolatization of cells within a selected region (UV system), (c) capturing or catapulting of structurally intact cells from a stained tissue section. RNA/DNA or protein can be extracted from the cell or tissue fragments for downstream applications to quantitatively study gene expression. This method can be applied to many downstream analyses including but not limited to quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), microarray, DNA genotyping, RNA transcript profiling, generation of cDNA library, mass spectrometry analysis, and proteomic discovery.The application of LCM is described here to specifically and reliably obtain a homogeneous cell population in order to extract RNA to study microRNA expression by quantitative real-time PCR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Neuroscience 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,787,304
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,676
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,789
of 352,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#295
of 996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.