↓ Skip to main content

Microbial Carotenoids from Bacteria and Microalgae

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Microbial Carotenoids from Bacteria and Microalgae'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Pathways of Carotenoid Biosynthesis in Bacteria and Microalgae
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Selection and taxonomic identification of carotenoid-producing marine actinomycetes.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Isolation, Characterization, and Diversity of Novel Radiotolerant Carotenoid-Producing Bacteria
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Novel Radio-Tolerant Astaxanthin-Producing Bacterium Reveals a New Astaxanthin Derivative: Astaxanthin Dirhamnoside
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Novel zeaxanthin-producing bacteria isolated from a radioactive hot spring water.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Microbial Carotenoids from Bacteria and Microalgae
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Engineering Escherichia coli for Canthaxanthin and Astaxanthin Biosynthesis
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Analysis of Canthaxanthin Production by Gordonia jacobaea
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Isolation and Light-Stimulated Expression of Canthaxanthin and Spirilloxanthin Biosynthesis Genes from the Photosynthetic Bacterium Bradyrhizobium sp. Strain ORS278
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Construction of Carotenoid Biosynthetic Pathways Through Chromosomal Integration in Methane-Utilizing Bacterium Methylomonas sp. Strain 16a
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Genetic Modification in Bacillus subtilis for Production of C30 Carotenoids
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Carotenoids’ Production from Halophilic Bacteria
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Construction and Utilization of Carotenoid Reporter Systems: Identification of Chromosomal Integration Sites That Support Suitable Expression of Biosynthetic Genes and Pathways
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Directed Evolution of Carotenoid Synthases for the Production of Unnatural Carotenoids
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 A High-Throughput Screen for the Identification of Improved Catalytic Activity: β-Carotene Hydroxylase.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 DNA Fingerprinting Intron-Sizing Method to Accomplish a Specific, Rapid, and Sensitive Identification of Carotenogenic Dunaliella Species
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Ketocarotenoid Biosynthesis in Transgenic Microalgae Expressing a Foreign β-C-4-carotene Oxygenase Gene
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Characterization of Carotenogenesis Genes in the Cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Obtaining Lutein-Rich Extract from Microalgal Biomass at Preparative Scale
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 NMR-Based Isotopologue Profiling of Microbial Carotenoids
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Analysis of Diapocarotenoids Found in Pigmented Bacillus Species
Attention for Chapter 6: Microbial Carotenoids from Bacteria and Microalgae
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Microbial Carotenoids from Bacteria and Microalgae
Chapter number 6
Book title
Microbial Carotenoids from Bacteria and Microalgae
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-879-5_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-878-8, 978-1-61779-879-5
Authors

Harada H, Misawa N, Hisashi Harada, Norihiko Misawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 5 25%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#18,466,751
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,924
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,561
of 244,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#325
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.