↓ Skip to main content

The Male Role in Pregnancy Loss and Embryo Implantation Failure

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: The Role of Uterine NK Cells in Normal Reproduction and Reproductive Disorders.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Role of Uterine NK Cells in Normal Reproduction and Reproductive Disorders.
Chapter number 5
Book title
The Male Role in Pregnancy Loss and Embryo Implantation Failure
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-18881-2_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-918880-5, 978-3-31-918881-2
Authors

Bulmer, Judith N, Lash, Gendie E, Judith N. Bulmer, Gendie E. Lash, Bulmer, Judith N., Lash, Gendie E.

Abstract

The human endometrium contains a substantial population of leucocytes which vary in distribution during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. An unusual population of natural killer (NK) cells, termed uterine NK (uNK) cells, are the most abundant of these cells in early pregnancy. The increase in number of uNK cells in the mid-secretory phase of the cycle with further increases in early pregnancy has focused attention on the role of uNK cells in early pregnancy. Despite many studies, the in vivo role of these cells is uncertain. This chapter reviews current information regarding the role of uNK cells in healthy human pregnancy and evidence indicating their importance in various reproductive and pregnancy problems. Studies in humans are limited by the availability of suitable tissues and the limitations of extrapolation from animal models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,283,046
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,969
of 4,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,832
of 353,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#189
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.