↓ Skip to main content

DNA Vaccines

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'DNA Vaccines'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 A Blueprint for DNA Vaccine Design
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Enhancement of Plasmid-Mediated Transgene Expression
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Strategies for Improving DNA Vaccine Performance
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Enhancement of DNA Vaccine Efficacy by Intracellular Targeting Strategies
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Progresses in DNA-Based Heterologous Prime-Boost Immunization Strategies
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Development of Antibiotic-Free Selection System for Safer DNA Vaccination
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Electroporation-Based DNA Delivery Technology: Methods for Gene Electrotransfer to Skin
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 DNA Vaccination in Skin Enhanced by Electroporation
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Intradermal vaccination by DNA tattooing.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Microneedle Applications for DNA Vaccine Delivery to the Skin
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Multivalent DNA-Based Vectors for DNA Vaccine Delivery
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Superparamagnetic Nanoparticle Delivery of DNA Vaccine
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Plasmid Fermentation Process for DNA Immunization Applications
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Pharmaceutical Grade Large-Scale Plasmid DNA Manufacturing Process
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Protective and Therapeutic DNA Vaccination Against Allergic Diseases
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Immunotherapy for Alzheimer’s Disease: DNA- and Protein-Based Epitope Vaccines
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Tetravalent DNA Vaccine Product as a Vaccine Candidate Against Dengue
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 DNA vaccination as a treatment for chronic kidney disease.
Attention for Chapter 9: Intradermal vaccination by DNA tattooing.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Intradermal vaccination by DNA tattooing.
Chapter number 9
Book title
DNA Vaccines
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0410-5_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-0409-9, 978-1-4939-0410-5
Authors

Joost H van den Berg, Koen Oosterhuis, Ton N M Schumacher, John B A G Haanen, Adriaan D Bins, Joost H. van den Berg, Ton N. M. Schumacher, John B. A. G. Haanen, Adriaan D. Bins, Berg, Joost H. van den, Oosterhuis, Koen, Schumacher, Ton N. M., Haanen, John B. A. G., Bins, Adriaan D., Berg, Joost H.

Abstract

DNA vaccination is an attractive vaccination method. First, the production of plasmid DNA as a vaccine is considerably more cheap and simple than the production of recombinant protein. Second, the expression cassette of DNA vaccines can readily be modified, making DNA vaccines highly flexible. Finally, in animal models, DNA vaccination is able to induce potent cellular immune responses. Over the past decade, the focus in the DNA vaccination field has in large part moved from intramuscular immunization towards dermal administration. As a natural "porte d'entrée" for pathogens, the skin is rich in antigen-presenting cells, which are required for generating an efficient antigen-specific immune response. This chapter describes a DNA vaccination protocol that utilizes a simple tattooing device for the dermal delivery of plasmid DNA. This technique, called DNA tattooing, is capable of generating high frequencies of antigen-reactive T cells in mice and macaques.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 41%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2014.
All research outputs
#18,370,767
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,861
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,346
of 305,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#294
of 597 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 597 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.