↓ Skip to main content

Gel-Free Proteomics

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Gel-Free Proteomics'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Mass Spectrometry-Driven Proteomics: An Introduction
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Metabolic Labeling of Model Organisms Using Heavy Nitrogen ( 15 N)
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Trypsin-Catalyzed Oxygen-18 Labeling for Quantitative Proteomics
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 ICPL Labeling Strategies for Proteome Research
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Quantitative Proteome Analysis Using Isobaric Peptide Termini Labeling (IPTL)
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Complete Chemical Modification of Amine and Acid Functional Groups of Peptides and Small Proteins
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Production and Use of Stable Isotope-Labeled Proteins for Absolute Quantitative Proteomics
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Organelle Proteomics
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Membrane Protein Digestion – Comparison of LPI HexaLane with Traditional Techniques
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 GeLCMS for In-Depth Protein Characterization and Advanced Analysis of Proteomes
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Exploring New Proteome Space: Combining Lys-N Proteolytic Digestion and Strong Cation Exchange (SCX) Separation in Peptide-Centric MS-Driven Proteomics
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Quantitation of Newly Synthesized Proteins by Pulse Labeling with Azidohomoalanine
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Analytical Strategies in Mass Spectrometry-Based Phosphoproteomics
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Protocol on the Use of Titanium Dioxide Chromatography for Phosphoproteomics
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Gel-Free Proteomics
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 N-terminomics: a high-content screen for protease substrates and their cleavage sites.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Protease Specificity Profiling by Tandem Mass Spectrometry Using Proteome-Derived Peptide Libraries
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Identification of Proteolytic Products and Natural Protein N-Termini by Terminal Amine Isotopic Labeling of Substrates (TAILS)
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Lectins as Tools to Select for Glycosylated Proteins
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Strong Cation Exchange Chromatography for Analysis of Sialylated Glycopeptides
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Titanium Dioxide Enrichment of Sialic Acid-Containing Glycopeptides
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Chemical De-O-glycosylation of Glycoproteins for Applications in LC-Based Proteomics
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Ubiquitination and Degradation of Proteins
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Bioinformatics Challenges in Mass Spectrometry-Driven Proteomics
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 A Case Study on the Comparison of Different Software Tools for Automated Quantification of Peptides
Attention for Chapter 10: GeLCMS for In-Depth Protein Characterization and Advanced Analysis of Proteomes
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
GeLCMS for In-Depth Protein Characterization and Advanced Analysis of Proteomes
Chapter number 10
Book title
Gel-Free Proteomics
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2011
DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-148-2_10
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-61779-147-5, 978-1-61779-148-2
Authors

Alicia Lundby, Jesper V. Olsen, Lundby, Alicia, Olsen, Jesper V.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Cameroon 1 2%
China 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 53 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Professor 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,506,823
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,403
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,655
of 181,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#142
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.