↓ Skip to main content

Citability of Original Research and Reviews in Journals and Their Sponsored Supplements

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Citability of Original Research and Reviews in Journals and Their Sponsored Supplements
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0009876
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie Citrome

Abstract

The contents of pharmaceutical industry sponsored supplements to medical journals are perceived to be less credible than the contents of their parent journals. It is unknown if their contents are cited as often. The objective of this study was to quantify the citability of original research and reviews contained in supplements and compare it with that for the parent journal.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Librarian 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 50%
Social Sciences 4 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2010.
All research outputs
#7,454,427
of 22,789,566 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,766
of 194,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,451
of 94,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#351
of 671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,789,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.